>>Model of language.
What's important to, what I want to point out here is
that you have all these different components.
So this is one among many models, I just chose the one from Bachman because he tends
to represent some other models as well.
And you notice that you have three components,
strategic competence is the one we're gonna leave aside for now because it tends
to be described as non-linguistic in nature.
It's more about strategic communication and is one of those factors
that may not help you define a native speaker.
Because a native speaker may have a certain competence in language but may not be as able,
strategically speaking, to communicate with others.
So you have a lot of variation among native speakers themselves.
But let's take a look at the other two then.
In terms of organizational competence, you have grammatical competence per se.
In here notice that he includes not only syntax and morphology,
which tend to be typically associated with grammar, but also the lexicon, phonology.
And then he separates discourse, in particular sociolinguistic ability,
elocution ability which is of course speech acts we discussed last time.
This is one of the big questions, I mean are you going to include
for example sociolinguistic appropriateness - whether you use formal or informal registers
for instance of the language in certain cases as part of grammar or not.
That's, that's a big question because depending on what answer you provide to that question,
your presentation of grammar of course is going to be different.
And of course discourse, textual competence, et cetera.